Thanks to DreamNetwork Journal for permission and sending the
transcript.What, Never heard of the DNJ?
Dream Network, A Journal Exploring Dreams & Myth
"Encouraging Individual & Cultural Appreciation for the Value of
Dreams" Roberta Ossana, Publisher/Editor
1337 Powerhouse Lane, Suite 22/PO Box 1026
Moab, UT 84532
801/259-5936 Voice Mail/Subscriptions: 800/861-3732
Email: DreamsKey@sisna.com
Website:http://www.dreamnetwork.net
The question "Should we control our
dreams?" has surfaced recently in the Dream Network letters to the editor
with respect to lucid dreaming. This is not a new issue in the dream move ment.
In fact, one of the most vivid memories I had from the 1990 Association for the
Study of Dreams (ASD) conference in Chicago was of a panel discussion on the
subject "Should we control our dreams?" Very passionate and
contradictory viewpoints were expressed. The same issues arise in Jungian
psychology with respect to active imagination and in therapeutic circles, in
general, when confronting the role of the conscious ego in relationship to the
contents of the unconscious and between the therapist, or guide, and the
dreamier. The issue of control touches the heart and soul of our relationship to
dreams and dreaming, but more importantly, it infuses every area of our lives.
We do not act, choose or relate without confronting the issue of control. Every
world view, theology, cosmology, social, political and economic system has, at
its core, a structure of belief about the appropriate nature, source and locus
of control. Once we identify our survival with one of these points of view we
act reflexively to defend that viewpoint, often with our lives.
In this article my purpose is not to provide a definitive answer to the issue
of control in dreams but to expand the dimensions of our explorations. Why, for
example, is this particular question so important to us in our cultural
framework? I will present three dream accounts in which the issue of control
arises in the dream and the accompanying dreamwork and I will explore: 1. some
aspects of the nature and function of control, 2. what we mean by
"our" dreams, and 3. who is the we that controls our dreams. As we
dialogue on these essentials, then we can begin to approach the question 'should
we control ourour dreams. As we dialogue on these essentials, then we might
begin to approach the question 'should we, or should we not, control our dreams?
o Control -- A Cultural Bias
In Western culture, in contrast to many primal cultures, for example, we
experience a primary split between Nature and Spirit, mind and body,
consciousness and matter, outer reality and inner reality. Core Judeo-Christian
images blended with Greek and Roman philosophy have provided a powerful engine
that drives our civilization. A core belief pattern is that "Man", is
subject to an unchanging law of God and is responsible to exercise dominion over
nature, which, since the "Fall," is under the power of Evil (Satan).
The only salvation for "Man" is to turn his life, loyalty and
obedience back to this unchanging God which will insure a place in Heaven in the
after-life. The secular, scientific, socio-political-economic models derived
from this hierarchy of God over fallen Man, and Man over a corrupt Nature, is
that we feel dissociated from Nature, including our own and we feel responsible
to freely exploit and control nature to insure our unending progress
(salvation). In this world view, God guides, or controls our destiny, and we
control or have dominion over acorrupt nature. In the extreme view, nature is
not worth saving at all. This simple vision of a hierarchy of power between God,
humanity and a corrupted nature is in sharp contrast to the visions it
supplanted and other major cultural and religious viewpoints.
For example, the Native American and other primal mythologies are not based
on an individualis tic ideal, or a hierarchy of control but on a relational, or
communal ideal which includes the animals and plants, rocks and sky as part of a
vital living community. It is not a model of dominance over, but of partnership
with all that is that is crucial to survival. Nature is experienced as a
conscious living being to be loved rather than an object to be used, abused and
discarded at will. The Great Spirit (God) is infused in nature so that
everything is in a living relationship to everything else. When we look at
dreams and dreaming through these very different and contra dictory viewpoints
we arrive at very different perspectives on the issue of control.
The question "should we control our dreams?" may arise from the
relationship to all that is. Then the issue of control is experienced in a
totally different light. Instead of a hierarchy of power we find ourselves in a
more fluid ecology and economy of shared relationships where the health of the
whole is more important than the autonomy of the parts. In this world view
dreams are meant to serve the whole community. The impossibility of determining
the source of dreaming as from either God or nature may reflect more on the
inadequacies of our limited world view than on the source or value of dreaming.
During the ASD panel, Eugene Gendlin expanded the focus when he pointed out the
importance of dialogue between the dreamer and the dream and within the dream.
Through inner-dialogue a felt-shift occurs in the body if a breakthrough is
achieved in the dreamer-dream relationship. During the question and answer
period I suggested that we further expand our understanding of who the
"we" is who is controlling in the first place.
My ongoing work with dreams and active imaging has revealed consistently that
the locus of 'dream ego' control changes dynamically when within the inner-image
experienced in relation to the body, through various feeling states and through
layers of imagery within the dreamscape. This suggests that the relationship
between the waking and dreaming domains are much more dynamic than we
acknowledge from our preexisting viewpoints. I believe that as we expand and
transform the limits of our understanding of our relationship to dreaming,we
will transform the same limits in our lives and in our world.
There are a variety of ways to facilitate a fluid relationship between the
many selves within our being. The key to all of them is to stay connected in the
relationships through dialogue, interac tion, choice and action. The following
dream, for example, invites the dreamer to take greater control.
W's Dream
W dreamed that he was standing on a beach near a wide inlet of water. On the
beach towering over him was a tall mechanical crane. The crane was unusual in
that it was constructed of a delicate spiderweb-like material. It had a long
arm. Whoever was in charge of the crane encour aged W to take over the controls
and operate the crane from where he stood. W felt very small, inadequate and
vulnerable. If the crane toppled it could fall on top of him. He wasn't sure of
his competency to operate such a large and delicate machine.
In the dreamwork that followed W reentered the dream. He reluctantly took the
controls and tried to operate the crane, which became unbalanced. He then
relinquished the controls for fear of causing an accident. At this point in the
reentry the scene changed. The crane now reached down using its own power and
swept the water away with its long arm. This motion exposed the sea-life to the
open air. In the nearby shallows a very large prehistoric Mako shark was exposed
to the air. W was shocked that such a dangerous creature had come so close to
shore where swimmers had been only moments before.
When W shared his associations related to the shark and the crane, it became
clear that they were aspects of himself. The tall artistic mechanical crane that
he had trouble controlling matched aspects of himself, as did the psychically
attuned, efficient shark that traveled easily in the deep waters. The exposed
identity of the small dream-ego, who was not in control, matched more closely
his fears about himself. When he was able to bring the feeling of the crane and
the shark into his body and view the reluctant person on the beach from that
perspective the locus of control shifted dramatically. In his waking life the
crane and the shark aspects operated independ ently of his diminished
self-image. As he became increasingly aware of the inner relationships between
the parts of himself, his abilities, and the way they serve him, he began to
exercise greater control from a more expanded awareness. In this dream the
invitation is for the dreamer to take greater control of his abilities and his
power.
J's Dream
The opposite is true in the following dream. At a recent meeting of California
Dreamworkers, Calamity shared the following dream. In the dream she saw her
daughter Jezabel at the top of the stairs holding a talisman that had been given
to Calamity by a beloved and skillful dreamer. In the dream the talisman opened
like a flower, turned inside-out and then crumbled into a black powder. Calamity
was appalled. The scene then changed. Now Calamity was alone in the middle of
the ocean holding on to a pole with one hand. The pole was anchored solidly to
the floor of the ocean and rose about twenty feet into the air. All of the ocean
was calm except around the pole. A whirlpool spun faster and faster. Calamity
spun out from the pole so that she had to hold on tightly with both hands. The
faster she and the water spun the more desperate Calamity felt and the tighter
she held on.
In the dreamwork, when Calamity realized that the pole was secure, she was
able to embrace the pole. The pole then shifted inside her body and aligned with
her spine. Now she could let go and feel safe, centered and peaceful at any
depth or height on the pole. On her way home that night, Calamity realized that
the pole was a symbol of her horse Spark. She had purchased Spark to replace the
one she had lost as a child. Her childhood pony had been her symbol of safety
and spiritual connection as a child.
When Calamity arrived home that night, Jezabel had prearranged to trailer
Spark to a horse-show the next day with another woman's horse. From Calamity's
perspective everything was wrong with this picture. Neither horse had been
trailered, the trailer was rented, etc. It was a disaster in the making.
Calamity immediately slipped into her pattern of feeling out of control and
distrusting the circumstances. Then Jezabel said "Mom, you never trust
me." The dreamwork immediately flooded back to Calamity. At that moment she
understood the dream. By entrusting Spark--the talisman--in Jezabel's hands it
could flower and turn inside out and release the magic of the spirit into the
atmosphere. When Calamity shifted to the new level of trust and allowed the
transformed dream energy to infuse the situation, the next day fell into place
like magic. Control was shared between herself, Jezabel and the magic of the
moment. This led to a positive shift in their relationship.
In W's dream the issue was for him to take greater control whereas Calamity
needed to let go of control and trust the connections in the moment. Here the
dream, the dreamwork and the outer events coincided in a magical synchronicity
where control was shared in a dance between the players and the greater purpose
of the moment.
o Control in Systems Theory
In systems theory control is shared by interacting processes that each
contribute to balance and equilibrium in the system as a whole enable the system
to fulfill its purpose. It restrains as well as guides and maintains the system
integrity as a whole. Should we exercise restraint over our dreams? Some people
are so overwhelmed by dream content that they need to find ways to slow the
frequency of recall. Others attempt, with great frustration, to recall any dream
or fragment. Some, plagued with overwhelming nightmares, need to find relief in
order to gain equilibrium in life. Should we exercise direction over our dreams?
Anyone who incubates a dream--a very common dream skill--is in some measure
setting out to exercise, at least partial, direction over dreams and dreaming.
Should our dreams exercise direction over our lives? Few serious dreamers would
deny the value of dreams for clarifying, at least on occasion, our life
direction. Should our dreams dominate us, or command us, hold us in check or
curb us? Even here we would, I believe, find occasions to say yes. I believe
that if we ponder the question of control deeply we will be compelled to
recognize that we are engaged in a co-creative relationship in life at every
moment.
o The Locus of Dream Control
The question is not a simple "should we control our dreams?" or
"should our dreams control us?" The question of control lies at the
heart and soul of who we are. From moment to moment we face the choice, the
freedom and the responsibility to exercise, relinquish or share control. Instead
of "should we control?" it makes more sense to ask *who*is in control,
under what circum stances, by what means and for what reasons at each and every
moment, in every aspect of our dreaming and waking life. We might then learn to
take seriously our relationships, our purpose, our freedom, our responsibility,
our limitations and the mystery of our existence in relationship to the vast
dimensions and connections between our inner and outer worlds.
I have learned that the locus of control varies fluidly in many dimensions.
It changes according to where the dream originates in the body. For example, in
the heart I may find a very different dream than in my stomach, throat or head.
The dreamer or dream-ego is an inveterate shape -shifter. In age, dress,
feeling, intention and context. It is humbling to realize that my inner
two-year-old makes so many of my decisions.
o Who is the 'we' that controls?
When tracking the locus of the dream during active therapeutic imaging we
note that shifts in feeling state, attention in the body, and changes in
context, also shift the dream-ego identity as well. At one moment the dream-ego
may be an innocent five-year-old. At another moment a traumatized
twelve-year-old. At still another moment a future older and wiser self. When the
various inner characters communicate, relate and act together, the inner world
changes naturally to reflect the resulting changes in the dreamers
consciousness. When conflict, confusion or dissociation represented in the inner
imagery becomes clear and resolved, the outer life experi ence, including
physical symptoms, shift accordingly. When we recognize and relate to these
'many selves' within us, we are then empowered to move to a higher order of
control in our dreams and in our waking life.
o The Western Fallacy of Independence
The western myth of the independent controlling ego may prove to be a major
fallacy of our fragmented civilization. When we come to recognize that free and
responsible choice is rather a product of a relational consciousness in a global
context, then we will understand our true relationship to our dreaming universe.
Control is not at all about me controlling the dream or about the dream
controlling me. It is rather a control that unfolds from a conscious
relationship in which we explore and co-create the universe together. The world
of our dreams is a flexible world in which we are able to safely practice and
rehearse, to blunder and fall, to discover, uncover and recover. It is here that
we expand our consciousness to embrace our many selves and the other. When we
bring our dream characters into our waking life they assist us in co-creating a
new world. When our battles are fought and resolved in the imaginal realm with
full consciousness, then we don't have to act out our violence in the physical
world. We are enabled to break through to new and vital ways of being in a
healthy world. This is the process of mythmaking. It is where we learn to crawl,
to walk, to run, to fly, and together to transform the world. When we are
attuned in this way, the inner and the outer coincide. Our dreams and
synchronicity then flow together seamlessly as we saw in J's dream experience.
R's Dream
A third dream example illustrates the issue of control in our dreams and in
our lives. At the same California Dreamworker'smeeting, R related the following
story from his recent trip to the Dreaming in India Conference. After thirty-six
hours of travel and finding himself overwhelmed by the stimulation of India, R
was working very hard to control and capture every minute of his experience in
his journal. He became exhausted and sick. Then he dreamed that he saw a
structure made of square cubicles. In each cubicle was an Indian God. He dreamed
that he awoke late in the day. He had, as a result, missed breakfast and the
morning events of the conference. Jarred from this realization he awoke to
realize that the first awakening was a false awakening. It was actually early in
the morning. He had plenty of time to prepare. When R related the dream to his
Indian room-mate, the room-mate said "It seems that you have an issue of
control. It will be very difficult for you to control your experience in
India." With this realization, R let go. He stopped recording every detail
in his journal and trusted the flow of his emerging experiences. His illness
subsided and from then on he flowed happily and easily through the remainder of
his journey, experiencing many synchronicities and adventures along the way. A
key to R's transformation was the timing of his sharing with, and accepting of,
the input from a stranger who could see the dream from an alternate perspective.
When we trust ourselves and our dreams with others, life expands in its
wonder and majesty. When we come into alignment with the myriad dimensions of
reality, our dreams and our life respond to us accordingly. We are supported in
taking greater or lesser control, or shifting our control to an expanded
dimension of reality where we adopt a seamless attitude between our dream life
and our waking life. It is ultimately the quality of our attitude that makes the
difference, not the degree of waking or sleeping, or our lucidity or nonlucidity.
By affirming a conscious relationship to our symbolic life we can discover
and rehearse the deep patterns and consequences of our choices and actions
before they are manifested in material form. With the courage, vulnerability and
commitment to seek the deeper layers of truth and good in our relationships
within and without we have within us the capacity to transform and heal, or to
abuse and destroy our world.
This is our final choice....
Fred Olsen, dreamtreck@aol.com
www.dreamgate.com/dream/reentry/
Thanks to DreamNetwork Journal for permission and sending the transcript.What,
Never heard of the DNJ?
Dream Network, A Journal Exploring Dreams & Myth
"Encouraging Individual & Cultural Appreciation for the Value of
Dreams" Roberta Ossana, Publisher/Editor
1337 Powerhouse Lane, Suite 22/PO Box 1026
Moab, UT 84532
801/259-5936 Voice Mail/Subscriptions: 800/861-3732
Email: DreamsKey@sisna.com
Website:http://www.dreamnetwork.net
|